Engagement with Third-Party Online Program Management Providers Policy
Summary
This UC Santa Barbara Professional and Continuing Education (UCSB PaCE) administrative policy outlines the responsibilities of UCSB PaCE in its engagement and annual review of third-party online education program management service providers (OPM), specifically those offering contractually obligated services for PaCE’s educational, revenue-generating programs.
Definitions
Third-party Online Program Management (OPM) Vendor or Service Provider: Any third party that provides one or multiple services of the following nature: instructional design, learner and instructor recruitment, international agents, marketing, sales, academic technology platform, market analysis, financial modeling, content/course development (including pre and post-production), white labeling of courses.
Scope of Policy
OPM Engagement, Procurement, Contract Creation, and Negotiation
This policy covers PaCE’s engagement with third-party online program management (OPM) vendors for online education program services. This policy also covers renewals of existing OPM service agreements initially issued before establishing this policy.
PaCE will conduct an initial annual review, which will commence in the Winter quarter of 2025, with the results due in June 2025. This review ensures adherence to compliance standards outlined on both PaCE and OPM websites. The findings and any actions taken to meet compliance requirements will be formally documented by PaCE.
PaCE’s Associate Dean centrally coordinates the review process. Every Winter quarter, the Associate Dean will direct the Program Managers responsible for OPM-contracted programs to perform the annual review.
Why We Have This Policy
This policy is intended to ensure the best operational and financial terms while also protecting UCSB PaCE’s reputation and brand. It promotes compliance with applicable laws, notably ADA accessibility and data security, and privacy, while ensuring that university IP is protected. It provides the EVC Office with the transparency needed to make informed decisions that ensure PaCE students and partners receive the greatest benefit possible through participation in online education programs. It also provides transparency, best practices, and compliance standards for academic units that use services from third-party online program managers and service providers. Finally, this policy provides a means for transparent communication to current and prospective students about the nature of the UCSB PaCE and OPM partnership. It will allow these learners to better understand the roles and responsibilities of the OPM provider in these academic programs.
Procedures
Online Program Management (OPM) Provider Vetting
- The process for vetting technology follows UCSB Procurement and Risk Management processes in accordance with Campus Policies and Standards. These areas for analysis include the following:
- Technology platform data security, data privacy, and accessibility compliance
- Digital content accessibility compliance
- Procurement processes and legal/policy compliance
- Additional analysis and review needed outside of the standard technology procurement processes include:
- Digital asset, as well as innovative enhancement of ownership and access
- Faculty intellectual property and copyright protection
- UCSB PaCE brand protection and business contracts review
- Financial modeling and feasibility analysis
- adherence to UC and UCSB policies, including faculty incentives and collective bargaining agreements
- OPM Instructor and Approval processes follow the same steps as PaCE’s non-OPM programs. The process is outlined in this document.
OPM Annual Review
The process for reviewing compliance standards (see below) and collecting the required information is:
- PaCE’s Associate Dean will reach out to the Program Managers affected by this review policy.
- PaCE’s Associate Dean will provide a template to be filled out by PaCE’s Program Managers. This template will collect the following information:
- Links to the appropriate sections of program websites that detail relevant information required by the below policies.
- Documentation of emails sent to students/OPM providers regarding curricula approval.
- Documentation verifying the collection of appropriate program revenue, including gross revenue and revenue shared according to OPM provider agreements/contracts.
- Finally, the PaCE’s Associate Dean will share specific dates with PaCE’s Program Managers for the initial review of the draft templates and the final submission deadline.
Compliance Standards to be Reviewed Annually
- All OPM provider relationships must be disclosed on the relevant course and program pages on the websites for PaCE and the partner’s website (as contractually obligated).
- All OPM Providers are required to follow our style guidelines and publish the required disclaimer text. To that effect, we provide a page template and a style guide to follow.
- Use of our logo to express ongoing partnership or collaboration will be part of the review.
- All relevant course and program pages on PaCE’s website must be linked to a dedicated informational webpage outlining the OPM provider's role.
- When the OPM provides instruction services for academic programs, the relevant course pages of the PaCE website must report instruction bio information, including education, training, and experience.
- PaCE’s academic program websites must disclose the amounts of all nonrefundable deposits or fees for those programs that are offered in collaboration with an OPM provider.